Connect with us

Published

on

James Comey’s irreparable reputation took another body blow this week after a memo emerged, written by the former FBI Director, appearing to exonerate Hillary Clinton of any wrongdoing in relation to her handling of classified information — prior to the investigation’s conclusion. With all the focus on Comey’s role in Hillary Clinton’s exoneration, it begs the question if the decision was made by a “higher power.”

No, not God.

But by a man who may think of himself as one — Barack Obama. National Review’s Andrew McCarthy believes Obama was the puppet master, so to speak, driving the narrative to insure Hillary was gotten off the hook, ensuring the Democrat Party continued its control over the White House.

National Review reports:

Let’s think about what else was going on in April 2016. I’ve written about it a number of times over the last year-plus, such as in a column a few months back: On April 10, 2016, President Obama publicly stated that Hillary Clinton had shown “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the [criminal statutes relevant to her e-mail scandal]). The president acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, its importance had been vastly overstated. This is precisely the reasoning that Comey relied on in ultimately absolving Clinton, as I recounted in the same column: On July 5, 2016, FBI director James Comey publicly stated that Clinton had been “extremely careless” in using a private email server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the relevant criminal statute).

The director acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, it was just a small percentage of the emails involved. Obama’s April statements are the significant ones. They told us how this was going to go. The rest is just details. In his April 10 comments, Obama made the obvious explicit: He did not want the certain Democratic nominee, the candidate he was backing to succeed him, to be indicted. Conveniently, his remarks (inevitably echoed by Comey) did not mention that an intent to endanger national security was not an element of the criminal offenses Clinton was suspected of committing – in classic Obama fashion, he was urging her innocence of a strawman crime while dodging any discussion of the crimes she had actually committed.

As we also now know – but as Obama knew at the time – the president himself had communicated with Clinton over her non-secure, private communications system, using an alias. The Obama administration refused to disclose these several e-mail exchanges because they undoubtedly involve classified conversations between the president and his secretary of state. It would not have been possible to prosecute Mrs. Clinton for mishandling classified information without its being clear that President Obama had engaged in the same conduct. The administration was never, ever going to allow that to happen.

As The Gateway Pundit reported on Friday, it looks like Comey has some explaining to do. The former FBI Director testified to Congress that he decided not to recommended charges in relation to handling of classified information, after the FBI interviewed Hillary Clinton on July 2, 2016. However, a new report reveals Comey penned a memo exonerating Clinton in the Spring.

On September 28th, 2016, Texas GOP Rep. John Ratcliffe asked Comey the following (simple) question:

“Director, did you make the decision not to recommend criminal charges relating to classified information before or after Hillary Clinton was interviewed by the FBI on July 2nd?”

Comey’s answer under oath?

“After”

Following the exchange, the Office of Rep. John Ratcliffe issued the following statement:

Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) exposed troubling new details today surrounding the Clinton email investigation during his questioning of FBI Director James Comey before the House Judiciary Committee. In the exchange, Ratcliffe focused on implications of the facts revealed by documents released by the FBI after Comey initially announced his recommendation not to press criminal charges against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Ratcliffe’s exchange with Comey showed that:

  • In his multi-decade career as a prosecutor Comey could not recall a single instance in which two key witnesses of a criminal investigation were allowed to sit in on an interview with the principle target of that same investigation, as was the case in the Clinton email investigation.
  • The FBI appears to have focused on only two portions of criminal code related to the mishandling of sensitive information, specifically in regard to Clinton herself, while ignoring the possible destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice by other parties. In fact, Comey readily admitted that Paul Combetta, who destroyed emails records of Hillary Clinton with Bleach Bit despite a preservation request to retain them, lied to federal investigators before receiving immunity.

“As a former federal prosecutor, I can tell you that it’s unheard of for a potential key witness to be present when the target of an investigation is being interviewed. In fact, I’ve never seen it. And Comey admitted he’s never seen it. The American people have every right to wonder why this occurred in Clinton’s case – this isn’t the treatment anyone else in our country would have received, and it frankly appears that the outcome of this investigation was predetermined from the start,” Ratcliffe said.

Documents released on Thursday show former FBI head James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton before the investigation into her email conduct had concluded. Even more concerning is “Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership,” reports Townhall.

According to new transcripts released by the Senate Judiciary Thursday afternoon, former FBI Director James Comey made the decision not to refer then Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for prosecution long before ever interviewing key witnesses. Members of the Committee allege Comey made the decision months before FBI agents were finished with the criminal investigation of her mishandling classified information during her time as Secretary of State.

The transcripts were revealed in a letter sent to current FBI Director Christopher Wray, in which lawmakers are demanding an explanation and more documents surrounding the case.

“According to the unredacted portions of the transcripts, it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton.  That was long before FBI agents finished their work.  Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership.  The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts,” the letter, signed by Chairman Chuck Grassley and Committee member Lindsey Graham states. “Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation.  The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”

Former Congressman Jason Chaffetz believes Comey may have committed perjury.

Jason Chaffetz said former FBI Director James Comey has a lot of “explaining to do” in light of new reports that he began drafting a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton even before interviewing key witnesses, including the former secretary of state.

“He’s certainly got a lot of explaining to do. He could have perjured himself,” the former House oversight committee chairman said on “Fox & Friends.”

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley and fellow GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote a letter to the FBI this week, expressing concern over whether Comey made up his mind about the email investigation months before his public news conference.

“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation,” the senators wrote. “The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”

Advertisement
5 Comments
  • cecelia Gepp says:

    the truth of all this needs to be uncovered and told to the American people

  • Larry says:

    Why is there only one camera man in the room

  • Dr. Johnny Ashburn says:

    To the Author/Authors

    You are a journalist and use the language of English to present your point of view.
    PLEASE: Do you know the purpose of the phrase “IT BEGS THE QUESTION ?” This is such a common mistake used by many , but shamefully used be journalists and radio and tv presenters. It is a philosophical method of Argumentation which in essence means The answer is in the Question asked.

    Please do your best to look up this method and begin using it properly.

  • Jim Self says:

    The investigating agents, with a work in progress, finding out that the director had already decided not to charge the target, Hillary Clinton… what the heck were they to do? It is subtle corruption to demand agents to follow their chain of command even when their superiors are obviously covering up crimes. The DOJ’s Lynch was obviously involved. The tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton sent that message to everyone loud and clear. Maybe that is why he did it. To let all of the FBI agents working in the Hillary investigation know that the fix was in and they would only hurt themselves by pushing the case. If you object you lose your job or get downgraded or sent to a slow division where no one wants to go. There may not be much that can be done about it now, but those of us who have working brains know what happened and we should never forget, because it will happen again. It was a heck of a smart thing for Bill to do. He is a master.

  • Dori says:

    Gee, really? Whoever would have guessers Obama would a done DAT?

  • News

    Top Democrat Congresswoman: Biden Is ‘Not Running Again’ for President

    Published

    on

    Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), chairwoman of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, said in an interview published over the weekend that President Joe Biden is not going to run for a second term in office.

    Maloney’s remarks, which were made during an interview at the start of the month with The New York Times Editorial Board, come as recent polling shows that a strong majority of Americans are concerned with Biden’s mental fitness for office.

    When asked, “Should President Biden run again,” Maloney responded, “Off the record, he’s not running again.”

    The Times immediately responded, “Not off the record. On the record.”

    “On the record?” Maloney responded. “No, he should not run again.”

    Bloomberg News reported this week that Biden was planning to launch his re-election bid following the upcoming midterm elections even though surveys have found that even an overwhelming majority of Democrats — 75% — do not want him to run again.

    When asked last month during an appearance on ABC’s “The View” on whether Biden “intends to run in 2024,” White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre responded by claiming that Biden is running.

    “So let me just say this and the president has been asked this question multiple times. So have I,” she claimed. “The president intends to run in 2024. That is something that he’s, again, has said multiple times. It is so far away right now. It is a long time away and what we are going to focus on, on how do we continue to deliver for the American public today, and the next day and has we have been doing the past 18 months. I will say this from that same poll that you are reading off of, is that in a head-to-head, the president beats Donald Trump.”

    Maloney during a primary debate earlier this month against Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said she did not think Biden would run again and then apologized the next day.

    “Mr. President, I apologize,” Maloney said on CNN. “I want you to run. I happen to think you won’t be running, but when you run or if you run, I will be there 100%. You have deserved it.”

    “You are a great president, and thank you for everything you’ve done for my state and all the states and all the cities in America,” she added. “Thank you, Mr. President.”

    Continue Reading

    News

    1 Dead, 17 Injured After Car Plows Into Crowd — Suspect Kills Woman with a Hammer After Fleeing

    Published

    on

    Two people are dead and at least 17 were injured in Pennsylvania after police say a man fatally plowed his car into a fundraiser event for the families of 10 people who died in a recent house fire, and then fled the scene and murdered a woman with a hammer.

    One death and all of the injuries occurred in the crash at the fundraiser in Berwick, before the driver fled the scene and beat a woman to death in nearby Nescopeck, according to police.

    The crash occurred at around 6:15pm on Saturday outside a restaurant called Intoxicology Department, which was hosting a day-long event to raise money for the families of those killed in a fire earlier this month.

    In a statement to DailyMail.com, Pennsylvania State Police said that the suspected driver, a male who is now in custody, fled the crash scene and, minutes later, murdered a woman in nearby Nescopeck.

    Local photographer Tony Bendele reported that shortly after the mass-casualty incident in Berwick, police were called to the scene of a second car crash in neighboring Nescopeck, where a man was beating a woman with a hammer.

    Police say they arrived on the scene and found the woman dead, and arrested the suspected killer. The vehicle in that incident matched the description of the one that had plowed through the crowd in Berwick moments earlier.

    However, at this time officials say that the suspect in Saturday’s fatal crash and murder is not a suspect in the fatal fire that killed 10 people on August 5, the cause of which remains under investigation.

    Berwick’s borough government said in a statement: ‘There is no indication that the incident in Berwick tonight was related to the event being held at Intoxicology Department.’

    ‘After speaking with law enforcement at the scene, there is no ongoing threat to the public,’ the statement added.

    Police said that the suspect, whom they declined to name, is being held at the state trooper barracks at Shickshinny awaiting criminal charges.

    Although they are in separate counties, Berwick and Nescopeck are twin hamlets connected by a bridge across the dividing Susquehanna River.

    The fatal fire on August 5, the Saturday crash at the fundraiser benefit, and the subsequent hammer murder all took place within a radius of less than a mile.

    At least 13 people hurt in the Berwick crash were being triaged for medical care at nearby Geisinger Medical Center, WNEP-TV reported.

    The areas around Center Street in Berwick were shut down after the crash, PA Homepage reported.

    In a Facebook post, Intoxicology Department, the restaurant where Saturday’s fundraiser was held, said they will close their doors until further notice.

    ‘Today was an absolute tragedy. We will be closed until further notice. Please respect our privacy while we grieve and try to process the events that occurred. Thank you.’

    Continue Reading

    News

    Cartel Violence Breaks Out in Mexico, US Consulate Issues Shelter-In-Place Order

    Published

    on

    U.S. government employees in Tijuana, Mexico, and other locations in Baja California were told to shelter in place amid rising violence and property crime, the U.S. Consulate in Tijuana tweeted Friday.

    There have been 19 reports of vehicles set ablaze in five cities in northern Mexico: Mexicali, Ensenada, Tecate, Rosarito, and Tijuana, according to NBC San Diego.

    Marina del Pilar Avila Olmeda, governor of Baja California, spoke out against the crimes breaking out in northern Mexico.

    “We will apply all the strength of our government so that there is peace and we find those responsible for these attacks,” the governor tweeted.

    Tijuana Mayor Montserrat Caballero Ramirez blamed the violence on the drug cartels and issued a plea for the rivalry to cease, according to NPR.

    “Today we are saying to the organized crime groups that are committing these crimes, that Tijuana is going to remain open and take care of its citizens,” Cabellero stated in a video, the outlet reports, “and we also ask them to settle their debts with those who didn’t pay what they owe, not with families and hard-working citizens.”

    The Tijuana Mayor has 2,000 police officers and 3,000 National Guard troops waiting on standby, according to NBC San Diego.

    Violence has risen in other areas of Mexico over the week including Cuquío and Ixtlahuacán del Río, Jalisco; Irapuato, Celaya, and León, Guanajuato; Juárez, Chihuahua; Tijuana, Tecate, Ensenada, Rosarito, Mexicali, Baja California.

    Baja Beach Fest, a three-day music festival, is currently taking place at Rosarito, Baja California, Mexico this weekend. The festival is working with law enforcement to ensure the safety of the crowd, according to Axios.

    Continue Reading

    News

    Top Biden Adviser Forced To Recuse Herself From Consulting On Key Issues After Pfizer, Green Energy Ties Revealed

    Published

    on

    A senior Biden administration adviser has been told that she will need to recuse herself from consulting on a number of high profile policy issues because of her work representing major entities like Pfizer and the American Clean Energy Corporation.

    CNBC reported this week that Anita Dunn, who joined the Biden administration in May as a senior adviser will also need to divest from a large investment portfolio, estimated to be valued at between $16-$48 million after the release of her financial disclosures.

    The move to recuse herself from certain policy issues and divest from her investment portfolio comes after warnings from lawyers that her portfolio and corporate ties could constitute a conflict of interest.

    The filings reveal that Dunn has worked for major entities like AT&T, Micron, the American Clean Power Association, Lyft, Pfizer, Reddit, and Salesforce. The filing also reveals work for the Ford Foundation, Valerie Biden Owens, and the Center for American Progress.

    The investment portfolio, held in conjunction with her husband and former Obama administration lawyer Bob Bauer, has a number of individual stocks in brokerage accounts, and corporate and municipal bonds.

    “The ethics rules require White House officials to recuse from matters that conflict with their financial interests. When officials have a large scope of duties and an even larger stock portfolio, sunlight is the best disinfectant,” said Kedric Payne of the Campaign Legal Center.

    Two of the entities, the American Clean Power Association and Pfizer, have been linked to contentious Biden administration policies.

    The American Clean Power Association describes itself as “the leading federation of renewable energy companies expediting the advancement of clean energy as the dominant power source in America.” It has often praised Biden for his stances on environmental issues.

    Most recently, its CEO Heather Zichal applauded the passage of the Democrats’ “Inflation Reduction Act,” which Biden is expected to sign. She said the bill “marks the point in time when the US decided to: get serious about climate change.”

    Pfizer, a pharmaceutical company responsible for one of the COVID vaccines, has also been impacted by Biden admin policies, as the president has strongly pushed for vaccine mandates for private businesses and the military.

    Former Office of Government Ethics head Walter Shaub told CNBC that Dunn needed to either divest from the companies or recuse herself from issues pertaining to companies in her stock portfolio.

    Initially, Dunn had avoided filing the disclosure when she worked in the Biden administration previously due to her role only as a temporary adviser. The Intercept reported in May that, because of this loophole, she had not been subject to the same scrutiny as others in the administration.

    The White House has said that Dunn will recuse herself from issues pertaining to her previous work and divest from her investment portfolio.

    Continue Reading

    News

    North Dakota School Board Ends Reciting the Pledge of Allegiance Because of the Words ‘Under God’

    Published

    on

    A North Dakota school board has put an end to reciting the Pledge of Allegiance before each meeting because members complained that the patriotic verse is problematic since it has the words “under God.”

    On Tuesday, the Fargo School Board voted 7-2 to stop reciting the Pledge of Allegiance before every meeting.

    North Dakota newspaper Inforum reported that a school board member nixed the Pledge of Allegiance because it didn’t align with the district’s diversity, equity, and inclusion values. Some of the school board members contended that the words “under God” were excluding many people.

    Fargo School Board member Seth Holden said, “Given that the word ‘God’ in the text of the Pledge of Allegiance is capitalized. The text is clearly referring to the Judeo-Christian god and therefore, it does not include any other face such as Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, all of which are practiced by our staff and students at FPS.”

    Holden claimed that saying the Pledge of Allegiance is a “non-inclusionary act.”

    Holden added, “The statement that we are ‘one nation under God,’ is the Judeo-Christian God… is simply an untrue statement. We are one nation under many or no gods.”

    He also stated that it is an “indisputable fact” that “not all U.S. citizens have liberty and justice… therefore making the line ‘one nation with liberty and justice for all’ an untrue statement.”

    School Board President Dr. Tracie Newman said, “I’m just not sure that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance is a useful way to begin every one of our board meetings. I would much prefer that we open our meetings with a shared statement of purpose that would bring us all together to do the work of the board.”

    Two other board members suggested that each meeting start with reading one of the school district’s values.

    Board member Robin Nelson argued that the Pledge of Allegiance should be recited at the meetings, and voted in favor of keeping it as part of the program.

    Former Fargo School Board member David Paulson stated, “We are misinterpreting the Pledge of Allegiance. The pledge isn’t a show of our patriotism, it’s an affirmation of our commitment and our loyalty to the greater cause, and that greater cause is freedom.”

    Four members of the community called for the Pledge of Allegiance to continue.

    The Fargo School Board only passed the motion to recite the Pledge of Allegiance before every meeting on March 22.

    The Fargo public school district will still allow schools to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.

    The Board further believes that the salute to the flag and the daily pledge of allegiance and the words and music of the national anthem can help students learn these principles. Therefore, the principal of each school and/or any teacher is allowed to provide a daily program for the voluntary salute to the flag and pledge of allegiance. This policy recognizes that the beliefs of some students and teachers prohibit their participation in these patriotic exercises. No person shall be required to salute, stand, or otherwise participate in this exercise if it is against his/her beliefs. All persons, however, are expected to show respect to the flag and to the participation of others in the exercise.

    Continue Reading

    News

    Pedophile Dies After Chugging Mystery Liquid as He’s Found Guilty of Child Sexual Abuse

    Published

    on

    A Texas man died on Thursday shortly after drinking a mystery liquid as he was being convicted of child sexual abuse, officials say.

    Edward Leclair, 57, was on trial in Denton, Texas, for five counts of sexual abuse involving one underage victim. He had been free on bond until the verdict on Thursday.

    “As these verdicts were being read, he chugged a bottle of water he had at counsel table,” Denton County Assistant District Attorney Jamie Beck told CNN.

    “Our investigator noticed him chug the water,” Beck said. “He told the bailiff he might want to go check on him. The bailiff did. He was unconscious in the holding cell.”

    The district attorney noted that the water appeared “cloudy.”

    Mike Howard – Leclair’s defense attorney – said Leclair had taken a “long drink from a water bottle” while listening to the verdict. He wasn’t sure what was in his client’s bottle.

    “Shortly after entering the holdover cell, he started vomiting, and emergency services were called,” Howard stated.

    Beck said a “medical intervention” happened at the courthouse. Medics unsuccessfully attempted to revive Leclair. The convicted pedophile was pronounced dead at the Medical City Denton hospital at 3:21 p.m., according to preliminary records from the Tarrant County Medical Examiner’s Office.

    An autopsy has been ordered, and the cause of death is listed as pending. The Texas Rangers are investigating Leclair’s death.

    “I can certainly say that it was highly emotional for everyone involved,” Howard told the Denton Record-Chronicle. “We were shocked by this. It does carry a lot of emotion and even more so for the jurors. They didn’t choose to do this. They were chosen, and as we told them, serving on a jury and making sure that the justice system works for the alleged victim and accused person is the cornerstone of being a citizen and making sure our government and society function.”

    Howard pondered how the court would proceed.

    “This is something that obviously doesn’t happen very often,” Howard said. “The judge in her 30 years and probably between us (prosecution, too) 100-plus years, [we] have never come across anything like this. The question is whether the legal thing to do is … declare a mistrial and have [the charges] dismissed, or is there another possible way to proceed?”

    According to a search warrant affidavit, Leclair responded to a personal ad on Craigslist in July 2016. He allegedly met a girl at a hotel for sex, and Leclair reportedly paid her $200. She is said to have sent him a nude photo via email.

    “After their initial encounter, the victim told Leclair she was 14. Leclair continued to communicate with her for sex,” the Denton Record-Chronicle reported. “According to the search warrant, they had three additional sexual encounters between them, one of which occurred at Leclair’s residence in Frisco.”

    Two years later, Leclair’s girlfriend, Melody “Mel” Shae, discovered the communication with the victim. She met the victim and told her that Leclar was “grooming her,” according to the affidavit.

    The affidavit also stated, “Mel was going to ‘help [her].’ Mel told her she could help the child make a lot more money, but she needed to go through Mel only.”

    Leclair was hit with child sexual assault charges on June 28, 2018, after the victim’s mother informed police that her daughter had been sexually assaulted.

    Continue Reading

    News

    CPS Employee Caught on Video Encouraging 14-Year-Old Girl in Foster Care to Become Prostitute

    Published

    on

    A Children’s Protective Services (CPS) employee was caught on camera telling a 14-year-old girl in foster care at a Harris County hotel to become a prostitute.

    Keisha Bazley, a mother of nine children, handed one of her troubled teen girls over to CPS with hopes the agency would help the child get back on track.

    Bazley told Fox 26 Houston that her teen daughter told her that one of the CPS workers was encouraging her to become a prostitute.

    The teen daughter told the CPS worker that she wanted food and the employee told her to become a prostitute.

    The 14-year-old videotaped the disturbing conversation and showed her mom.

    The CPS employee was terminated, according to Fox 26 Houston.

    Fox 26 Houston reported:

    Keisha Bazley has nine kids. She turned to Child Protective Services to help her with her 14-year-old daughter, who she says was running away and causing trouble at school,

    “My daughter told me that the worker had been telling her she should do these things, so she said she decided to video her,” Bazley said.

    CPS is housing the girl at a hotel. She’s one of dozens of foster kids living at hotels in Harris County.

    In the video, the girl tells the CPS employee she wants food. The CPS worker tells her to be a prostitute.

    “And giving her an incentive to do so, and almost a threat of not having her needs being met, if she didn’t do what this woman very explicitly told her to do,” Schneider said.

    “If me, the parent, was to do something like this to my child, I would be bashed,” said Bazley. “I would be called a horrible parent. I would lose my kids.”

    Jamie Masters, the Commissioner of CPS, came to Houston to personally apologize to Bazley and her daughter.

    “I’ve never seen that happen before where the commissioner of CPS comes in from Austin, just to apologize about something horrible that’s been done to a child involved with CPS,” Schneider said. “It’s bad enough if it’s just one bad rogue worker. It concerns me that it may be bigger than that, and they need to make sure it’s not just one person, and they’ve got to find a way to protect these kids.”

    WATCH:

    Continue Reading

    Trending Today

    >